According to the Reserve Bank of India, India’s percentage in poverty is way over the world average. India ranks the first in poverty percentage (United Nations).This is a huge number and most likely caused by lack of resources for the huge population that India has. After the implementation of the one child policy, it has alleviated poverty by promoting family planning, holding population growth under control and raising the life quality of the population in those areas. According to the National Bureau of Statistics in China, the poverty proportion in China has decreased from 35% in 1978 to 15% in 1985, and there is a continuous decrease in the poverty proportion (see Fig. 1). As too many births links to economic and cultural backwardness, population in India should be controlled to combat poverty.
India is among the top 5 countries with the highest carbon emission in the world. According to the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research created by the European Commission and Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency in 2015, India ranks number 4 in the world in carbon emission, with up to 2.5 million carbon dioxide (kt) emission in 2015 (see Fig. 2). China is an example of avoiding excess carbon emission with the population control policy. From the one-child policy, China avoided around 300 million births, meaning she has averted 1.3 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide in 2005 based on average world per capita emissions of 4.2 tonnes (Doyle). From controlling population growth, this can help suppress the increasing carbon emission in India.
The onus of contraception has almost entirely fallen on women and female sterilisation has become the most opted method of contraception over the last few decades. Since Independence, more than 35 two-child policy bills have been tabled in the Parliament; the most recent bill was Uttar Pradesh’s Population (Control, Stabilisation and Welfare) Bill, 2021. The states of Chhattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, and Haryana have rescinded the two-child norms that they had earlier adopted (so the two-child policy has crept into the fabric of society, with many states adopting it in a clandestine manner). The irony is that India’s birth rate and the size of families are decreasing because of women’s own reproductive choices. Many women are getting surgical contraception after having two children (or after having a son). As happened at the height of China’s one-child policy, Indians could lose government jobs and more if such laws were passed at the national level.
The “one-child policy” – limiting births per couple through coercive measures – was implemented in the early 1980s, and fertility dropped dramatically. While there are no national two-child policy in India as of July 2021, there are local laws. These family planning laws are aimed toward politicians, both current and aspiring. Under the policy, people running in panchayat (local government) elections can be disqualified if they have not respected the two-child policy.
And they got rid of their unwanted infant daughters in most cruel ways. By the time the time the rule was amended to a “two-child policy” in 2015, irreparable damage had been done. It was almost as if girls had been purged from the one child policy india population in those 35 years. The 2021 bill proposed incentivising a two-child family size with housing subsidies, soft loans for constructing or purchasing a house, tax rebates, increased pensions, and free health care facilities.
px” alt=”one child policy india”/>https://www.1investing.in/ or to people who wanted babies. They were taken from hospitals, from homes, from midwives who had been asked to kill them. I remembered visiting the cradle baby outfit set up by Jayalalitha and wondering what would happen to the cute babies lying there in cradles.
There is no evidence to suggest that this has had the intended outcome. Modern research from the West indicates that growing up without siblings puts a child at no intellectual, social or emotional disadvantage. In China, which enforced a brutal one-child policy from 1979 to 2015, other repercussions are now apparent.
Comments are Disabled